FUNDAMENTALS OF GOD & LIFE

The authenticity of the scripture lies in the WORD OF GOD, which was discovered or gifted to Don Juravin, the founder of the Original Bible Foundation. This string of 1,197,000 Hebrew letters functions as a unique code, similar to the DNA of a living organism, that reveals the divine message. GOD has encoded each of the 22 Biblical Hebrew letters with two unique numbers from 1 to 510, resulting in a code2GOD value of 78,091,262. The WOG was divided into 305,490 words, 23,206 verses, and 929 chapters, collectively known as “The Original Bible”. It is crucial to emphasize that only the original scripture holds coded messages from GOD.

Human translations of the bible are subject to the interpretation and personal experiences of the translators, resulting in misconceptions and misunderstandings of crucial concepts, such as heaven, hell, satan, witches, and other significant aspects of life. For instance, the oryx animal was deliberately mistranslated as the mythical unicorn. Additionally, religious organizations and televangelists have manipulated the already flawed King James Version, thereby fostering fear and promoting reliance on the clergy.

Hence, it is vital that we rely exclusively on the coded source of scripture and not any human interpretations of the bible.

GOD is the “thing” that is responsible for the formation of life (different than creation), and possibly the impact on human lives (such as events, luck, or genetics) in the present. GOD is a nonreligious “thing” which is different from the human-made God concept created in our minds by religious organizations or televangelists. GOD created the Hebrew letters, the Hebrew language, the WORD OF GOD, and the original Bible. 

Reality is what we perceive individually; reality is subjective;

The question of what constitutes reality has long been a subject of philosophical debate but the Copenhagen Interpretation and Quantum Mechanics made it scientific.

Some have argued that reality is objective and exists independently of the observer, while others contend that reality is subjective and shaped by the observer’s perceptions. Don Juravin states that reality is information encoded in the brain as “real,” and that this information implies meaning that is a comparison, or a match, to something from one’s database in the mind.

Argument 1: Reality is Information Encoded in the Brain as “Real”

The brain processes a vast amount of sensory information from the external world, and this information is encoded as “real” through a complex network of neurons and synapses. This information is then integrated into our conscious experience of reality. Our perception of the external world is thus a product of our brain’s interpretation of sensory information.

Argument 2: Information Implies Meaning

Information is meaningless unless it is interpreted and given meaning. The meaning of information is a comparison, or a match, to something from one’s database in the mind. Our minds contain a vast database of experiences, memories, and associations that are used to make sense of new information. This is why people with different experiences and backgrounds can interpret the same information in different ways.

Argument 3: Reality is Subjective

If reality is information encoded in the brain as “real,” and information implies meaning, then it follows that reality is subjective. Our individual experiences and interpretations of the world are shaped by our unique databases of experiences, memories, and associations. This is why different people can have vastly different perceptions of the same event.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, we argue that reality is information encoded in the brain as “real,” and that this information implies meaning that is a comparison, or a match, to something from one’s database in the mind. Our individual experiences and interpretations of the world are subjective and shaped by our unique databases of experiences, memories, and associations. While this view of reality may seem to undermine the idea of an objective reality, it is a more nuanced and complex understanding of how we experience the world around us. Ultimately, the question of what constitutes reality may never be fully resolved, but this debate article provides a framework for understanding the role of the mind in shaping our perceptions of the world.

Our adherence to the doctrine put forth by the Vatican regarding the canon of holy scripture is primarily centered around the premise that the first five books of the Bible, known as the holy gospels, hold preeminence over the remaining texts, which are regarded as letters. This stance is derived from the Vatican’s official website.

Heaven is a KJV’s mistranslation of the original Bible 

Satan, as an evil entity, doesn’t exist in the original Bible.

The original Hebrew Bible is the source of all human translations of bibles. The original offers a different perspective on Satan. In the Hebrew Bible, the word “satan” (שטן) appears several times and refers to an obstacle, opponent, or adversary, but not an entity of evil. This article will explore the use of the term “satan” in the Hebrew Bible and argue that it serves a positive purpose in our lives, challenging us to become better individuals.

The Hebrew word “satan” means “adversary” or “opponent.” It appears in various forms in the Hebrew Bible, such as a verb (e.g. Numbers 22:22), a noun (e.g. 1 Samuel 29:4), and an adjective (e.g. Psalm 109:6). In all instances, the word “satan” is used to describe someone or something that opposes or obstructs another person or thing.

For example, in Numbers 22:22, “satan” is used as a verb to describe the angel of the Lord who stood in the way of Balaam as he was trying to go to Moab. The angel served as an obstacle to Balaam, preventing him from going where he wanted to go. In 1 Samuel 29:4, “satan” is used as a noun to describe David, who was perceived as an adversary by the Philistines. And in Psalm 109:6, “satan” is used as an adjective to describe the wicked person who opposes the psalmist.

In all these instances, “satan” is used to describe someone or something that is acting as an obstacle or opponent, not as an evil entity. The term does not refer to a supernatural being or fallen angel as it is often interpreted in Christian tradition.

Moreover, the Hebrew Bible does not portray “satan” as a force of evil that opposes God. Instead, it presents the concept of “satan” as a tool that God uses to test his followers and challenge them to grow and develop. In the Book of Job, for instance, “satan” appears as a member of God’s court and challenges Job’s faith by asking God to allow him to test Job’s loyalty (Job 1:6-12). Satan serves as a test or trial for Job, pushing him to question his faith and ultimately leading him to a deeper understanding of God.

In this way, “satan” serves a positive purpose in our lives, challenging us to become better individuals. It is not an evil entity that seeks to tempt us to sin, but rather a force that encourages us to grow and develop.

It is important to note that the Hebrew Bible does not present “satan” as a separate entity from God. There is no dualistic struggle between good and evil in the Hebrew Bible, as seen in some other religions. Instead, God is presented as the one and only omnipotent force in the universe. The concept of “satan” is used as a tool to challenge us and help us grow, but it is not more powerful than God.

The idea of Satan as a supernatural being and force of evil originated in Christian tradition, particularly in the New Testament. However, this concept is not present in the original Hebrew Bible. The portrayal of “satan” in the Hebrew Bible as an adversary or obstacle is much more nuanced and complex than the Christian interpretation of Satan as a personified evil entity.

In conclusion, the concept of “satan” in the Hebrew Bible is not an entity of evil, but rather an obstacle or adversary that challenges us to become better individuals. The term is used

In the Book of Job, Satan is portrayed as an adversary who challenges God by questioning the loyalty of Job, a faithful servant of God. God allows Satan to test Job’s loyalty by taking away his possessions and afflicting him with a painful skin disease. In this context, Satan is not an evil entity, but rather an instrument used by God to challenge Job’s faith and strengthen it.

Another example of Satan as an obstacle or opponent can be found in Zechariah 3:1-2, where the prophet sees a vision of the high priest Joshua standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to accuse him. Here, Satan is not an evil entity, but rather an accuser or opponent who is challenging Joshua’s worthiness to serve as high priest.

It is worth noting that in the Hebrew Bible, the word “satan” is often used without the definite article “ha” to indicate a generic adversary or opponent, rather than a specific entity. For example, in 1 Kings 5:4 (Hebrew version), King Hiram of Tyre sends messengers to King Solomon with the greeting “May the Lord your God be with you, as he was with your father David, and may he make you even more successful than your father David! May you have allies and friends to help you, and may your enemies (satan) be defeated.” In this context, “satan” simply means “enemies” or “adversaries,” and is not a reference to a specific entity.

It is clear from these examples that in the original Hebrew Bible, the word “satan” is used to refer to an obstacle or opponent, rather than an entity of evil. The idea of a physical embodiment of evil known as Satan is a later development in Christian theology, and has no basis in the original Hebrew Bible.

So why is the concept of satan important in our lives? It is important to understand that the idea of an opponent or obstacle is not necessarily negative. In fact, it can be argued that facing challenges and obstacles is a necessary part of personal growth and spiritual development. When we face obstacles, we are forced to confront our weaknesses and limitations, and to find ways to overcome them. This can lead to a greater sense of resilience, self-awareness, and self-confidence.

Furthermore, the idea that there is no entity more powerful than God is a fundamental tenet of monotheistic religions. If Satan were a physical entity of evil, then he would be a rival to God in terms of power and influence. This would contradict the idea of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving God. The concept of satan as an opponent or obstacle allows for the possibility of challenges and setbacks in life, without compromising the idea of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

In conclusion, the word “satan” in the original Hebrew Bible does not refer to a physical entity of evil, but rather to an obstacle or opponent. The idea of satan is important in our lives as a necessary part of personal growth and spiritual development, and as a reminder that challenges and setbacks are opportunities for us to learn and grow. It is also a reminder that there is no entity more powerful than God, and that challenges and obstacles can be overcome with faith, perseverance, and the help of God.

The original Hebrew Bible provides evidence that satan is not a physical being, but rather a metaphorical representation of an obstacle. In Hebrew, “שטן satan” translates to “adversary” or “opponent,” and does not refer to a physical entity. This raises the question of why the idea of a physical Satan is so pervasive in modern interpretations of religion.

The likely possibility is the mistranslation and manipulation of the original text, is evidenced in the King James bible. Translators intentionally created a dramatic flare to scare believers and create a dependency on the clergy, the church, or the protection of the king. The concept of satan as a physical being plays into this manipulation, as it creates a need for the church to act as a mediator between humans and this evil supernatural being.

Furthermore, the church created a mechanism to protect this deception: if one reveals the truth that there is no real physical Satan in the original Bible, then he/she is Satan himself. This rule effectively silenced those who questioned the existence of a physical Satan and maintained the church’s hold over its followers.

The concept of a satan as an obstacle can be seen in several examples from the original Bible in Hebrew. In the Book of Job, a satan is presented as a challenger to Job’s faith, rather than a physical entity. a satan argues that Job’s faith is only strong because he has been blessed with wealth and a comfortable life, and challenges him to maintain his faith even in the face of hardship. This interpretation aligns with the original meaning of the Hebrew word for satan, which denotes an adversary or opponent.

In another example, the prophet Zechariah is shown a vision of a high priest standing before an angel of the Lord, with a satan standing at his right hand to accuse him. This can be interpreted as a metaphorical representation of an obstacle that the high priest must overcome, rather than a physical Satan.

The concept of a satan as an obstacle is further supported by the use of the term in other ancient Hebrew texts. For example, in the Dead Sea Scrolls, a satan is presented as a figure who tempts individuals to stray from the path of righteousness, rather than a physical being.

Evil is a misfortune of one and a fortunate of others. In global terms, much more good is created with each evil than the cost of the evil deed. Alternatively, an evil act can be a divine call for humans affected to take action.   

The occurrence of life on earth is a phenomenon that defies a straightforward explanation. While some may contend that the emergence of life is the result of random coincidences, this view is not substantiated by empirical or biblical evidence. Rather, the complexity and intricacy of life, along with the self-sustaining systems that support it, suggest that it is not a coincidence, but rather an orchestrated event that is guided by a greater logic.

Scientifically, this is evident in the process of evolution, where organisms adapt to their environment over time through natural selection. The survival of fittest species is not a coincidence but a result of the fitness and adaptations of that species to its environment.

Biblically, the creation of life is viewed as a deliberate act by a higher power. The intricacy and interdependence of living organisms, as well as the creation of systems that support their existence, suggest a design that goes beyond mere coincidence. It is manifested in the biblical parable of Job.

In essence, while the intricacy and complexity of life may appear beyond comprehension, it is critical to acknowledge that life’s existence is guided by a greater logic that extends beyond the realm of human understanding.

Relevancy, debate points, and practical application:

We are here to debate the existence of Satan as an evil entity. Don Juravin states that Satan, as a figure of evil, does not exist in the original Bible, and that religious organizations promote the notion of an evil entity only to scare the public and create more dependency on their services.

Point 1: The Hebrew word “שטן” that is often translated as “Satan” actually means “an obstacle.” This misinterpretation has led to the creation of Satan as an evil entity. The original Bible does not mention Satan as an evil entity, and therefore, it can be argued that Satan is a human-made concept.

Point 2: Televangelists and religious organizations use the notion of Satan as a tool to scare people and create more dependency on their services. By portraying Satan as an evil entity that can influence people’s lives, they create a sense of fear that drives people to seek protection from them.

Point 3: If there is any Satan, and GOD is almighty, then it must be at the approval of GOD. If Satan is an evil entity that exists and is successfully standing up to GOD in any way, then Satan is the more powerful entity believers ought to worship. This is a paradox that cannot be reconciled with the idea of a supreme and almighty GOD.

Point 4: If Satan exists and has more impact on people’s lives than GOD, then they ought to worship the entity that has more impact on their life. This is not consistent with the idea of a supreme and almighty GOD, who is supposed to be the one and only entity worthy of worship.

Conclusion: In conclusion, we argue that Satan, as an evil entity, doesn’t exist in the original Bible and was made up for religious organizations and televangelists. By promoting the notion of Satan, they create a sense of fear and dependency that keeps people coming back to them. Furthermore, religious organizations created another layer to protect their story: anyone who says there is no Satan, is Satan himself. We urge the public to question the existence of Satan and not be swayed by fear tactics.

1. If Satan exists, and not at the approval of GOD, that means that GOD is not almighty as Satan, and therefore one should worship the stronger entity.
2. If there is a Satan that is successfully standing up to GOD in any way, like religious organizations scare believers, then Satan is the more powerful entity believers ought to worship.
3. If Satan exists and has more impact on people’s lives, then they ought to worship the entity that has more impact on their life.
4. If GOD isn’t “almighty,” then there is no reason to worship him. 

Conclusion: Satan, as an evil entity, doesn’t exist in the original Bible and was made up, and still a viable story, for religious organizations and televangelists. Furthermore, religious organizations created another layer to protect their story: anyone who says there is no Satan, is Satan himself.

In various passages throughout the Bible, GOD indicates that He may reset or reboot His plan for humanity if it is deemed necessary. For instance, in Genesis 6:5-7, it is written that, “The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD regretted that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart. So the LORD said, ‘I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land, man and animals and creeping things and birds of the heavens, for I am sorry that I have made them.’” Here, GOD expresses remorse over creating humanity and decides to reset His plan by flooding the earth and starting anew with Noah and his family.

Similarly, in the book of Revelation, GOD speaks of a time when He will bring an end to the current world order and establish a new one. Revelation 21:1-5 states, “Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.’”

Additionally, it is possible that humanity itself may reboot its own plan, as seen in the story of the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11:1-9. In this account, humans attempted to build a tower to reach the heavens and become like God. However, GOD saw this as an act of pride and rebellion and decided to confuse their language so they could no longer work together to achieve their goal. The result was that the people were scattered and went their separate ways, thus resetting the plan for humanity.

GOD is responsible for the greater good of the world, or the universe. GOD is responsible for the overall welfare of the world or the universe. As a result, an individual may not always perceive events as being in their personal best interest, as a negative experience for one person may correspond to a positive experience for another. This concept is exemplified in the parable of Job.

code2GOD #7 calls for you to see a problem as an opportunity:

The unfolding of historical events over the past 7,000 years and in the present era is proceeding in accordance with the intended design of a higher power. This unfolding of human destiny is viewed as progressing according to a preordained plan, with modifications possibly being made as necessary. Such alterations to the course of events may be construed by humans as miraculous occurrences or unusual phenomena.

It is widely recognized that human beings possess the capacity to construct realities that are often regarded as objective facts. For instance, a question such as “Did Jesus walk on water?” will commonly receive an affirmative answer. This is primarily because of the vast number of Christians, approximately 20 billion, who have affirmed their belief in this event over the past 2,000 years. This collective agreement has resulted in the construction of a reality that is widely accepted as a fact.

Similarly, the question of whether the Mezuza located at the entrance of a Jewish household is considered holy, will typically receive an affirmative answer. This is attributed to the Jewish family’s practice of kissing and praying with the Mezuza over a period of 7 years. This ritualistic behavior has imbued the Mezuza with a sense of sanctity, further contributing to the creation of a perceived reality that is accepted as a fact.

The Positive Impact of Tragedy: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction: Tragedies are often associated with negativity and loss, but in reality, they can also have a positive impact on society. In this article, we will examine the various ways in which the death of a five-year-old girl, for example, can lead to positive changes and benefits.

1. Media Coverage: The media thrives on news stories, especially tragic ones. The increase in coverage leads to higher viewership and revenue for media outlets, which in turn boosts the economy.

2. Defense Budget: Tragic events often lead to an increase in the defense budget, which benefits many people who work in the defense industry.

3. Emerging Politicians: Tragic events can also propel politicians into the spotlight, helping them gain exposure and support for their causes.

4. Future Path: The death of a loved one can shape a person’s future in a positive way. For instance, the girl’s brother may become a passionate congressman and advocate for change.

5. Community Advocacy: The tragedy can lead to the formation of nonprofits or advocacy groups that work to improve people’s lives.

6. Increased Tolerance: Society learns to be more tolerant and appreciative of life as a result of tragic events.

7. Religious Organizations: Tragedies often lead to increased attendance at religious services, providing comfort to those who are grieving.

8. Funeral Companies: Unfortunately, funeral companies benefit from tragic events, but they also provide essential services to families during their time of need.

9. Kindness: Tragic events can inspire people to be kinder to one another, increasing social cohesion and community involvement.

10. Medical Advances: The death of a child can inspire parents to invest more in their surviving child, leading to breakthroughs in science and medicine.

11. Technological Advances: Tragedies can inspire companies to develop new technologies to prevent future tragedies, such as in the case of an Israeli hi-tech company.

12. Emotional Connection: Tragic events can bring people closer to their emotions, leading to increased empathy and kindness.

Conclusion: Tragic events can have a profound impact on society, leading to positive changes and benefits. It is important to recognize the good that can come out of tragedy and work towards making the world a better place. The original Bible teaches us about this system, as mentioned in the book of Job, and it is essential to take this into account when analyzing the impact of tragic events.

——

When someone gets the job, many others lose that job. When someone is happy, there is probably someone sad. When someone dies, others benefit from it. When a terrible terrorist attack happens and a 5-year-old girl is murdered, many people benefit from it. Example:

1. The news media get more business (advertisers, news anchors, reporters, etc.)
2. The defense budget rises and benefits many
3. It feeds emerging politicians 
4. It shapes people’s futures for the good. For example, her brother may become a passionate congressman
5. It shapes communities as her family members may start a nonprofit and advocate issues that make people’s lives better
6. It benefits society as they learn to be more tolerant and appreciate life
7. It benefits religious organizations
8. It benefits funeral companies
9. It shapes people to be kinder to one another
10. As a result of her death, her parents invested more in her brother which turned to be a scientist discovered a medical cure
11. An Israeli hi-tech company received a contract to create a more sofisticated surveillant system that will later will prevent many more terror attacks. It would not have been possible if not for the death if this 5 year old. 
12. It unified the nation and people were crying which brought them to be kinder and closer to their emotions. 

There are more points, and each of the above causes better in a chain reaction. All of that goodness from the death on one 5-year-old girl. The balance sheet of goodness vs losses is by far in favor of the goodness which was designed by GOD. He taught us about this system of his in the original Bible in the book of Job.

The above was deduced by Don Juravin based on the code2GOD. 

From a biological perspective, humans are wired to have an innate drive to want more and compete. This drive is deeply rooted in the evolutionary history of our species, where competition for resources and mates was crucial for survival. While civilization has brought about a shift towards cooperation and altruism, the primal urge to compete and take chances remains. In fact, studies have shown that the reward centers in our brains light up more when we take risks or break rules, even if it’s just in our minds.

For example, a study published in the journal “Nature Neuroscience” found that the reward centers in the brain were more activated when participants in a gambling experiment took risks that violated the rules of the game. Another study, published in the “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, found that people are more likely to admire and even reward individuals who take risks, even if those risks lead to negative consequences.

Therefore, while being civilized and caring are important, the drive to compete and take risks is deeply ingrained in our biology. This doesn’t mean that we should abandon ethics and morality, but rather that we must recognize and manage these primal urges in order to achieve a balance between our competitive nature and our moral code.

The fear of uncertainty is a fundamental aspect of the human psyche and surpasses all other fears, even the fear of death. Individuals may not fear death if they have knowledge of when and how it will occur, but the absence of such knowledge creates anxiety and distress. This phenomenon is supported by scientific research, which has demonstrated that the human brain is wired to respond to uncertainty with a heightened level of alertness and reactivity.

For instance, studies have shown that the amygdala, a part of the brain responsible for processing emotions, is activated in response to uncertainty. This can result in a range of physiological responses such as increased heart rate, elevated blood pressure, and rapid breathing. Additionally, the prefrontal cortex, which is involved in decision-making and problem-solving, may become impaired under conditions of uncertainty, leading to feelings of helplessness and anxiety.

Real-life examples of this phenomenon can be observed in situations such as waiting for medical test results or uncertain job security. In both cases, the absence of information creates a sense of ambiguity and lack of control, leading to feelings of anxiety and distress. Understanding the profound impact of uncertainty on the human psyche can help individuals cope with such situations and work towards developing strategies to manage this innate fear.

GOD transcends the limitations of time, space, and human comprehension. This understanding of GOD is grounded in the belief that the divine is not bound by the constraints of physical dimensions or the cognitive limitations of human perception. Rather, GOD is perceived as an omnipotent and omniscient entity that exists beyond the realm of human experience.

From this theological perspective, the concept of GOD can be seen as a transcendent force that operates outside the realm of human comprehension. As such, any attempt to limit God to a specific time or space would be inherently flawed, as such limitations are inherently human constructs. The transcendental nature of GOD is further reflected in the many religious traditions that posit the existence of multiple dimensions of reality beyond the physical realm, where the divine is believed to exist.

In essence, the concept of GOD is intimately tied to the idea of transcendence, representing an entity that is beyond human limitations and capable of operating beyond the confines of time and space. This understanding of GOD underscores the vast and profound nature of the divine, as well as the limitations of human perception in understanding such a complex and transcendent force.

Example: two people received $10,000. The poor person will be happy, while the billionaire will be disappointed. The delta, the difference, is what matters.

The human experience is shaped by a complex array of psychological and social factors, including our expectations, past experiences, and cultural norms. One crucial factor that impacts our emotional states is the concept of “delta,” or the difference between our current state and our previous state.

Psychological research has demonstrated that people tend to experience greater satisfaction when there is a positive delta between their current state and their previous state. For instance, if an individual is accustomed to a certain level of income, receiving a raise or promotion that increases their income level will result in a positive delta and lead to feelings of satisfaction and happiness.

Conversely, individuals tend to experience negative emotions when there is a negative delta, or a decrease in their current state compared to their previous state. For example, if someone becomes accustomed to a certain standard of living, experiencing a decline in that standard, such as losing a job, can lead to negative emotions such as anxiety, depression, and despair.

This phenomenon is not unique to humans, and research has shown that some animals also experience changes in emotional states based on delta. For instance, animals kept in captivity may exhibit negative emotions when exposed to environments that differ significantly from their previous state.

It is important to note that delta is not an absolute factor or number that yields happiness or sorrow. Rather, it is the difference between two experiences in time or current to expected that shapes our emotional response. This can vary widely between individuals, depending on their past experiences, personal goals, and cultural values.

Overall, the concept of delta is a crucial factor in shaping human emotions and behaviors. By understanding how delta impacts our emotional states, individuals can develop strategies to manage their emotional well-being and work to promote positive delta in their lives. This includes cultivating gratitude, setting realistic expectations, and actively seeking out positive experiences that can boost our emotional state.

Humans have a tendency to understand and appreciate matters only in relative terms and not in absolutes. This can be seen in the simple example of driving forward, where the perception of movement is derived from the relative motion of other objects, such as trees, moving backwards. This perception of relative motion is not limited to physical experiences, but is also applicable to psychological and social experiences.

People often derive happiness or sadness, feelings of being lucky or unlucky, only when they compare themselves to others around them or those they grew up with. The sense of satisfaction or dissatisfaction is not based on absolute measures of success or failure, but rather on the relative standing in comparison to others. This is demonstrated in real-life experiences where individuals who are financially comfortable may still feel unhappy if they perceive others around them to be more successful. On the other hand, individuals who are financially disadvantaged may still feel content and happy if they perceive themselves to be better off than those around them.

This phenomenon can be explained through the concept of social comparison theory, which proposes that individuals evaluate themselves by comparing their abilities, skills, and opinions with those of others. This comparison allows them to evaluate their standing in society, and can influence their self-esteem and sense of well-being. The relative comparison of one’s situation with others’ creates a sense of context and meaning that is essential for individuals to derive value and purpose from their experiences.

From a genetic perspective, parents are inclined to have an innate desire to procreate and raise offspring who are superior to themselves. It is a natural instinct that is seen across multiple species. When asked about their aspirations for their children, many parents express a desire for their children to be happy. However, the concept of “happiness” can be subjective and vague.

When Don Juravin asks a parent what he wants or wishes for his kids, he gets the answer, “I want my kids to be happy,” to which Mr Juravin sarcastically answers, “so you basically support late sleeping, overeating, listening to laud music, not going to school, never working and possibly using drugs?!”

Don Juravin has thereby pointed out the paradox of such a desire, as the steps that may lead to the child’s happiness may contradict the parents’ other goals, such as ensuring the child’s health, education, and financial stability. Parents must navigate this dilemma to find a balance between fulfilling their genetic drive and ensuring their child’s well-being.

The Law of Attraction is a concept that suggests that positive or negative thoughts and emotions can bring about corresponding positive or negative experiences in a person’s life. While some skeptics view this concept as pseudoscience or superstition, research in psychology has found evidence to support the validity of the Law of Attraction. This is due to the powerful impact that the mind can have on a person’s thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.

For example, one study found that participants who visualized themselves successfully achieving their goals were more likely to take action towards achieving those goals. In contrast, participants who focused on their failures or difficulties were less likely to take action towards achieving their goals. This shows that a person’s mindset can have a significant impact on their actions and overall success.

Furthermore, the Law of Attraction is often used in various forms of therapy, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, to help individuals shift their negative thinking patterns and replace them with positive thoughts and emotions. This approach has been shown to be effective in treating conditions such as depression, anxiety, and addiction.

Overall, while the Law of Attraction may not be fully understood or accepted by everyone, it is clear that the power of the mind and one’s thoughts can have a profound impact on their life experiences.

The planet Earth is a battleground for both survival and expansion. Even seemingly peaceful locations are characterized by constant struggles in nature. One example is the forest, where trees compete for sunlight at the canopy level and for water below ground. Insects threaten the trees in the middle of their trunks, leading to battles for self-protection. However, despite their perceived passivity, trees have evolved to cut symbiotic deals with a range of creatures in order to survive.

Animals, birds, and insects are similarly engaged in constant struggles for survival, often driven by the need to protect their offspring or to mate. These struggles occur across various habitats on the planet, from the depths of the ocean to the peaks of mountains. For instance, predators like lions hunt their prey on the savannah, while birds of prey like eagles engage in aerial battles over prey. Even microscopic organisms such as bacteria and viruses engage in battles for survival, competing for resources in a never-ending struggle.

In short, the reality of life on Earth is that it is characterized by an endless fight for survival, expansion, and dominance. Nature is rarely at peace, and creatures across the planet are constantly engaged in battles for survival.

The human inclination to love GOD defies rationality, akin to the illogical desire to procreate and the willingness to sacrifice one’s life for one’s offspring. Humans are inherently programmed to love GOD and prioritize their children over their own survival.