The possibility of gradual development as a “rolling myth” is also unlikely. Beyond the fact that the claim “maybe” can always be raised in any field, and it is not enough to reject an established historical tradition, we have also seen that the Jewish tradition is far from being similar to myths and folk legends that were generally accepted at the time: associated with the force of nature, the prohibition to represent GOD in a statue and picture, the negative descriptions of the people, and the distinct historical characteristics of detailed descriptions of time, places, and names.
All of these constitute a great deviation from all the accepted stories in antiquity. A critical examination comparing the tradition of the revelation of Judaism to the traditions of the other cultures and peoples only highlights the huge gap between them.
We have also seen that the tradition is strengthened by other pillars of Judaism, such as the unique and wonderful history of the People of Israel, which was foretold in the Torah.
Finally, we have shown the general problematic nature of the skeptical approach, which instead of allowing us to learn about the past, blocks from us clear perception and assertions of a stable truth and body of knowledge. We countered the skeptical approach against the Jewish tradition.
