How the atheists compares to the agnostic

Thus, the question arises: what is the difference between the type C atheist, as described above, and the agnostic type C? After all, both recognize that there is evidence for the existence of GOD, which cannot be completely disproved, but also cannot be completely proved. But the agnostic take a rational position and understands that the obvious choice, in this case, is to remain in doubt.

Even if agnostics have a tendency to favor one party or another, they understand that this tendency does not necessarily reflect the ontological reality, and for that reason, they suspend their judgment.

Under the circumstances, that’s a perfectly legitimate stance to take.

Atheists, on the other hand, pretend to climb all the way back from their personal positions to the ontological claim. They are sure that, if they are not convinced by the evidence for the existence of GOD, then they have a legitimate right to ascend from stage C to stage B (claiming “there is no evidence for the existence of GOD”), and from there to stage A (“GOD does not exist”). And they believe this is rational.

For if they had not pretended to do so, what would be the difference between this person and the agnostic? Had the atheists remained in stage C, at the level of personal decision, they would have to admit that they simply do not know whether GOD exists or not and that their personal inclination on the subject has nothing to do with the revealing of objective truth.

But, because atheists define themselves not as agnostics, but as atheists, they nevertheless try to ascend from their personal inclination to the heights of ontological reality and to determine that GOD does not exist. Because of this, they are as ignorant and arrogant as the same atheist who openly supports the ontological claim on determining the existence of GOD.

"The Logical Proof Of GOD" book by HOLY LAND MAN

More Posts


In the spiritual world reside the forces that operate our lives in daily reality. Get to know them, because your happiness depends on them.

While we are selfish creatures with survival mechanisms and animal instincts to achieve more than we need, we’re also wired (DNA & neurotheology) for spirituality and to live for the greater good, for the higher self. For that reason, we are wired to protect our spouse, our family, our country, and be connected to a higher spirituality we call GOD (whatever it is).

We seek to connect to the highest authority which is above human sensual perception. We seek a GOD to be our ultimate guide. Not the GOD that the religions created for us with endless restrictions and imaginary hell and heaven, but the true real GOD.

This book sums up thousands of years and debates to one practical conclusion: is it good for humans to have and believe in (a) GOD or not.

While emerging in the debate, keep an open mind and ignore any religious misconception of who GOD really is. You are here because you care to know if there is a higher authority and if your life will be more fulfilled with GOD in it. You want to know if spirituality is good for you.


The spirit is invisible, but it is revealed in every phenomenon in life that means oneness. It is revealed the moment you look into a person’s eyes and discover that you both feel the same. Spirituality is revealed as soon as you do something that makes others a caravan of joy. It is revealed the moment someone refers to you and you refer to him, and you are both aware of each other’s existence. As a Roman poet so beautifully put it: “Outside all the notions of good and evil there is a field. Will you meet me there?”

Socrates was said to have not come from Athens, but from the world. You and I are two aspects of one reality, united and all-embracing. In unity no differences are eliminated. For things to unite, they do not have to lose their individual identities.  In unity only the separation between them is abolished, which is the difference in value and importance. Then it turns out that everything is one thing.

Share on Social Media