Accordingly, this is, for example, the approach of Alvin Plantinga, a great contemporary philosopher of religion. This approach claims that our basic beliefs can be trusted, as long as we have no reason to doubt them. If we adopt an identified belief, then the claim that it is not rational to believe in GOD without proof is not true. On these grounds, it is perfectly rational to believe in GOD, even if there is no proof of his existence, if this belief is accepted as a basic belief.

Exactly the same way we believe in the existence of the world, even though there is no proof that it actually exists outside of our individual consciousness. Even if there is no proof of its existence, this belief is acceptable as a basic belief. Believers may carry a higher burden of proof that GOD exists.

It is not at all clear that in a debate between believers and atheists, the burden of proof is on the former. It is true that when it comes to arguing about the existence of something new that we have not heard of before – such as the existence of aliens, for example – the burden of proof will be on those who claim that it exists. But when it comes to the existence of an old and well-known entity such as GOD, who since the dawn of humanity humans have had the evidence of his revelations and experiences all over the world, it is possible that the burden of proof will be on those who deny his reality and also general existence.

If this is compared to the historical realm, for example, anyone attempting to argue that Alexander the Great and Napoleon were myths would bear the burden of proof since these figures have been accepted as historical fact. Someone might be able to prove that these historical individuals did not exist, as long as the doubter did not pose positive proof of the negative argument, the default is to believe that they were real. A similar claim may be made in relation to the existence of GOD, and to impose the burden of proof on those who deny it. In this context, it is worth reading what Holy Land Man has written about the principle of “Occam’s Razor” and its limitations.

"The Logical Proof Of GOD" book by HOLY LAND MAN

More Posts


In the spiritual world reside the forces that operate our lives in daily reality. Get to know them, because your happiness depends on them.

While we are selfish creatures with survival mechanisms and animal instincts to achieve more than we need, we’re also wired (DNA & neurotheology) for spirituality and to live for the greater good, for the higher self. For that reason, we are wired to protect our spouse, our family, our country, and be connected to a higher spirituality we call GOD (whatever it is).

We seek to connect to the highest authority which is above human sensual perception. We seek a GOD to be our ultimate guide. Not the GOD that the religions created for us with endless restrictions and imaginary hell and heaven, but the true real GOD.

This book sums up thousands of years and debates to one practical conclusion: is it good for humans to have and believe in (a) GOD or not.

While emerging in the debate, keep an open mind and ignore any religious misconception of who GOD really is. You are here because you care to know if there is a higher authority and if your life will be more fulfilled with GOD in it. You want to know if spirituality is good for you.


The spirit is invisible, but it is revealed in every phenomenon in life that means oneness. It is revealed the moment you look into a person’s eyes and discover that you both feel the same. Spirituality is revealed as soon as you do something that makes others a caravan of joy. It is revealed the moment someone refers to you and you refer to him, and you are both aware of each other’s existence. As a Roman poet so beautifully put it: “Outside all the notions of good and evil there is a field. Will you meet me there?”

Socrates was said to have not come from Athens, but from the world. You and I are two aspects of one reality, united and all-embracing. In unity no differences are eliminated. For things to unite, they do not have to lose their individual identities.  In unity only the separation between them is abolished, which is the difference in value and importance. Then it turns out that everything is one thing.

Share on Social Media